JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 13, 2001

A- de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Concha Prieto De Caballero

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Corte Constitucional
  • Inaplicación del precepto constitucional
  • No puede arrogarse competencias para llenar vacíos legislativos
  • Organo aplicador de la Constitución
Sala Disciplinaria Del Consejo Superior De La Judicatura
  • Dirime conflictos de competencia entre distintas jurisdicciones
Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Conocimiento para resolverlo debe ser expreso
Estado Social De Derecho
  • Posición jurídica del individuo o del funcionario público
8 topics · 9 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se declaró que el Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo del Meta es el competente para conocer de la tutela formulada mediante apoderado por la ciudadana de la referencia, de acuerdo con lo establecido en el Art. 86 de la Constitución Política y 37 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.

En consecuencia, se ordenó que por Secretaría General de esta Corporación se remitan oportunamente las diligencias al citado Tribunal, al Despacho del Magistrado al cual le fueron inicialmente repartidas.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DECLARAR que el Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo del Meta es el competente para conocer de la accion de tutela formulada mediante apoderado por la ciudadana Concha Prieto de Caballero.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR que por Secretaria General se remitan oportunamente las diligencias al Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo del Meta, al Despacho del Magistrado al cual le fueron inicialmente repartidas.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.